Biology of Sport
pISSN 0860-021X    eISSN 2083-1862
Archival Issues
Volume 34, 2017
Volume 33, 2016
Volume 32, 2015
Volume 31, 2014
Volume 30, 2013
Volume 29, 2012
Volume 28, 2011
Volume 27, 2010
Volume 26, 2009
Volume 25, 2008
Volume 24, 2007
Volume 23, 2006
Volume 22, 2005
Volume 21, 2004
Volume 20, 2003
Archival Issues 1984-1998
Search
Newsletter
Information for Authors
Special Information
 » 
Journal Abstract
 
Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study
Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac, Simone S Mantuani, Cassiano Merussi Neiva, Carlos Eduardo Lopes Veradi, Dalton Müller Pêssoa-Filho, Leonardo Pimenta
Biol Sport 2015; 32(2):103-108
ICID: 1134312
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 10.00
Abstract provided by Publisher
 
The aim of the present study was to analyse the usefulness of the 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for prescribing and self-regulating high-intensity interval training (HIT) in young individuals. Eight healthy young subjects (age = 27.5±6.7 years) performed maximal graded exercise testing to determine their maximal and reserve heart rate (HR). Subjects then performed two HIT sessions (20 min on a treadmill) prescribed and regulated by their HR (HR: 1 min at 50% alternated with 1 min at 85% of reserve HR) or RPE (RPE: 1 minute at the 9-11 level [very light-fairly light] alternated with 1 minute at the 15-17 level [hard-very hard]) in random order. HR response and walking/running speed during the 20 min of exercise were compared between sessions.No significant difference between sessions was observed in HR during low- (HR: 135±15 bpm; RPE: 138±20 bpm) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 168±15 bpm; RPE: 170±18 bpm). Walking/running speed during low- (HR: 5.7±1.2 km · h-1; RPE: 5.7±1.3 km · h-1) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 7.8±1.9 km · h-1; RPE: 8.2±1.7 km · h-1) was also not different between sessions. No significant differences were observed in HR response and walking/running speed between HIT sessions prescribed and regulated by HR or RPE. This finding suggests that the 6-20 RPE scale may be a useful tool for prescribing and self-regulating HIT in young subjects.

ICID 1134312

DOI 10.5604/20831862.1134312
 
FULL TEXT 368 KB


Related articles
  • in IndexCopernicus™
         exercise prescription [0 related records]
         heart rate [1 related records]
         high-intensity interval training [0 related records]
         rating of perceived exertion [0 related records]


  •  

    Copyright © Biology of Sport  2017
    Page created by Index Copernicus Ltd. All Rights reserved.