Biology of Sport
pISSN 0860-021X    eISSN 2083-1862
Archival Issues
Volume 34, 2017
Volume 33, 2016
Volume 32, 2015
Volume 31, 2014
Volume 30, 2013
Volume 29, 2012
Volume 28, 2011
Volume 27, 2010
Volume 26, 2009
Volume 25, 2008
Volume 24, 2007
Volume 23, 2006
Volume 22, 2005
Volume 21, 2004
Volume 20, 2003
Archival Issues 1984-1998
Information for Authors
Special Information
Journal Abstract
Reliability and smallest worthwhile difference in 1RM tests according to previous resistance training experience in young women
Matheus Nascimento do Nascimento, Alex Silva Ribeiro, Camila de Souza Padilha, Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva, Jerry L Mayhew, Marçal Guerreiro do Amaral Campos Filho, Edilson Serpeloni Cyrino
Biol Sport 2017; 34(3):279-285
ICID: 1245479
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 10.00
Abstract provided by Publisher
The objective of this study was to determine the familiarization and smallest worthwhile difference (SWD) of one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests in detrained women according to their previous resistance training experience. Three groups of women with varying amounts of previous resistance training experience were recruited: Novice (n = 27, 1 to 6 months), Intermediate (n = 13, from 7 to 12 months), and Advanced (n = 20, 13 to 24 months). All participants performed four 1RM test sessions in the bench press (BP), squat (SQ), and arm curl (AC). A significant (p< 0.05) (group vs. time) interaction was observed in SQ suggesting that more experienced participants needed fewer 1RM test sessions to reach a stable load compared to the less experienced groups. Strength changes (p<0.05) observed in BP and AC occurred with no significant interaction for groups (p> 0.05), suggesting that experience had no impact on familiarization for these lifts. SWDs suggest that strength gains greater than 2-4% in these lifts would indicate a meaningful improvement in strength beyond random variation from trial to trial no matter the experience of the subject. Women with limited previous resistance training experience do not require more trials to reach load stabilization than those with more experience. Stability of 1RM loads for BP and AC may require only two sessions, while SQ may require at least three trials.

ICID 1245479

DOI 10.5114/biolsport.2017.67854

Related articles
  • in IndexCopernicus™
         muscle strength [13 related records]
         exercise evaluation [0 related records]
         Reliability [22 related records]
         Neural Learning [0 related records]
         Female [134107 related records]


    Copyright © Biology of Sport  2017
    Page created by Index Copernicus Ltd. All Rights reserved.